Newton's second law of motion states that $F=frac{d(mv)}{dt}$. This is a first-order differential equation, in which the order of differentiation of momentum is 1. So we can write it $F=frac{d^k(mv)}{dt^k}$ where $k=1$.
Newton used the dot notation for differentiation and unlike Leibniz did not conceive of orders of differentiation that were not integers. Perhaps if he had he would have changed his notation, because it's hard to draw half a dot! We, however, have no such difficulty.
Let's make $k$ probabilistic, so that its mean value is 1 but it varies from 1 with decreasing probability as the difference from 1 increases. Let's assume the probability density function of its distribution is normal, so that $f(k)=N(1,sigma)$, and let's further assume that $sigma$ is a universal constant.
If $sigma = 0$, we get $F=frac{d(mv)}{dt}$, and either a Newtonian universe or, when we take mass to be relativistic, an Einsteinian one.
If we assume a big bang cosmology on the Lambda-CDM model, is there a value $epsilon > 0$ such that if $sigma < epsilon$ we still get the same cosmology, because the tweak we have made to the equation $F=frac{d(mv)}{dt}$ is too small to make a difference?
And what happens to the currently prevalent version of big bang cosmology when we increase the value of $sigma$ such that a difference is actually made?
I ask the question in that way because I am not saying let's give $sigma$ a large value such as 0.5. I am saying let's give it a very tiny value that will just begin to have a cosmological effect. What will that cosmological effect be?
Bearing in mind that non-integer-order derivatives are non-local, do we get matter appearing out of empty space and a possible basis on which to support a steady state cosmology? What other adjustments might be suggested - of big bang theory, quantum theory, or both?
No comments:
Post a Comment