Say we have a relativistic fluid/gas, as we have in some astrophyical systems.
Now let us write:
ee - energy density in the fluid's rest frame.
PP - pressure in the fluid's rest frame.
nn - number density in the fluid's rest frame.
mm - mass of the particles.
I know that for the non-relativistic case we have:
e=nmc2+frac1hatgamma−1Pe=nmc2+frac1hatgamma−1P
where hatgammahatgamma is the adiabatic index. hatgamma=1+frac2fhatgamma=1+frac2f for a gas with ff degrees of freedom.
For the ultra-relativstic case we have:
e=3Pe=3P
My question is what is e(P,n)e(P,n) for a relativstic case (which is the general case of the 2 limits shown above)? I would also like to know how to derive it.
Is the following way the correct way to do it ? :
The number density of particles is:
n=intinfty0np(p)dpn=intinfty0np(p)dp
The pressure is:
P=intinfty0frac13pv(p)np(p)dpP=intinfty0frac13pv(p)np(p)dp
The energy density is:
e=intinfty0epsilon(p)np(p)dpe=intinfty0epsilon(p)np(p)dp
where:
np(p)=(2s+1)frac1e(epsilon(p)−mu)/kBT+(−1)2s+1frac4pip2h3np(p)=(2s+1)frac1e(epsilon(p)−mu)/kBT+(−1)2s+1frac4pip2h3
Here s is the spin of the particles, for electrons s=frac12.
epsilon(p)=(m2c4+p2c2)frac12
v(p)=fracdepsilondp=fracpmleft(1+left(fracpmcright)2right)−frac12
From calculating the three integrals above we can finally obtain e(P,n).
Can anyone confirm this is the proper way to do it, or am I missing something here?
It seems as if those integrals cannot be solved analytically - is this
true?Perhaps in this case there is no explicit formula for e(P,n)?
No comments:
Post a Comment