Sunday, 5 November 2006

intuition - Etale cohomology and l-adic Tate modules

newcommandbbmathbbDeclareMathOperatorgalGalnewcommandbbmathbbDeclareMathOperatorgalGal
Before stating my question I should remark that I know almost nothing about etale cohomology - all that I know, I've gleaned from hearing off hand remarks and reading encyclopedia type articles. So I'm looking for an answer that will have some meaning to an etale cohomology naif. I welcome corrections to any evident misconceptions below.



Let E/bbQE/bbQ be an elliptic curve the rational numbers bbQbbQ: then to E/bbQE/bbQ, for each prime ellell, we can associate a representation gal(barbbQ/bbQ)toGL(2n,bbZell)gal(barbbQ/bbQ)toGL(2n,bbZell) coming from the ellell-adic Tate module Tell(E/bbQ)Tell(E/bbQ) of E/bbQE/bbQ (that is, the inverse limit of the system of ellkellk torsion points on EE as ktoinftyktoinfty). People say that the etale cohomology group H1(E/bbQ,bbZell)H1(E/bbQ,bbZell) is dual to Tell(E/bbQ)Tell(E/bbQ) (presumably as a bbZellbbZell module) and the action of gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) on H1(E/bbQ,bbZell)H1(E/bbQ,bbZell) is is the same as the action induced by the action of gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) induced on Tell(E/bbQ)Tell(E/bbQ).



Concerning this coincidence, I could imagine two possible situations:



(a) When one takes the definition of etale cohomology and carefully unpackages it, one sees that the coincidence described is tautological, present by definition.



(b) The definition of etale cohomology (in the case of an elliptic curve variety) and the action of gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) that it carries is conceptually different from that of the dual of the ellell-adic Tate module and the action of gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) that it carries. The coincidence is a theorem of some substance.



Is the situation closer to (a) or to (b)?



Aside from the action gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) on Tell(E/bbQ)Tell(E/bbQ), are there other instances where one has a similarly "concrete" description of representation of etale cohomology groups of varieties over number fields and the actions of the absolute Galois group on them?



Though I haven't seen this stated explicitly, I imagine that one has the analogy [gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) acts on Tell(E/bbQ)Tell(E/bbQ): gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) acts on H1(E/bbQ;bbZell)H1(E/bbQ;bbZell)]::[gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) acts on Tell(A/K)Tell(A/K): gal(barbbQ/bbQ)gal(barbbQ/bbQ) acts on H1(A/K;bbZell)H1(A/K;bbZell)] where AA is an abelian variety of dimension nn and KK is a number field: in asking the last question I am looking for something more substantively different and/or more general than this.



I've also inferred that if one has a projective curve C/bbQC/bbQ, then H1(C/bbQ;bbZell)H1(C/bbQ;bbZell) is the same as H1(J/bbQ;bbZell)H1(J/bbQ;bbZell) where J/bbQJ/bbQ is the Jacobian variety of CC and which, by my above inference I assume to be dual to Tell(J/bbQ)Tell(J/bbQ), with the Galois actions passing through functorially. If this is the case, I'm looking for something more general or substantially different from this as well.



The underlying question that I have is: where (in concrete terms, not using a reference to etale cohomology as a black box) do Galois representations come from aside from torsion points on abelian varieties?




[Edit (12/09/12): A sharper, closely related question is as follows. Let V/bbQV/bbQ be a (smooth) projective algebraic variety defined over bbQbbQ, and though it may not be necessary let's take V/bbQV/bbQ to have good reduction at p=5p=5. Then V/bbQV/bbQ is supposed to have an attached 5-adic Galois representation to it (via etale cohomology) and therefore has an attached (mod 5) Galois representation. If VV is an elliptic curve, this Galois representation has a number field K/bbQK/bbQ attached to it given by adjoining to bbQbbQ the coordinates of the 5-torsion points of VV under the group law, and one can in fact write down a polynomial over bbQbbQ with splitting field KK. The field K/bbQK/bbQ is Galois and the representation gal(barbbQ/bbQ)toGL(2,bbF5)gal(barbbQ/bbQ)toGL(2,bbF5) comes from a representation gal(K/bbQ)toGL(2,bbF5)gal(K/bbQ)toGL(2,bbF5). (I'm aware of the possibility that knowing KK does not suffice to recover the representation.)



Now, remove the restriction that V/bbQV/bbQ is an elliptic curve, so that V/bbQV/bbQ is again an arbitrary smooth projective algebraic variety defined over bbQbbQ. Does the (mod 5) Galois representation attached to V/bbQV/bbQ have an associated number field K/bbQK/bbQ analogous to the (mod 5) Galois representation attached to an elliptic curve does? If so, where does this number field come from? If V/bbQV/bbQ is specified by explicit polynomial equations is it possible to write down a polynomial with splitting field K/bbQK/bbQ explicitly? If so, is a detailed computation of this type worked out anywhere?



I'm posting a bounty for a good answer to the questions succeeding the "Edit" heading.

No comments:

Post a Comment