Thursday, 16 November 2006

nt.number theory - Does the image of a p-adic Galois representation always lie in a finite extension?

I have been looking at Serre's conjecture and noticed that there are two conventions in the literature for a p-adic representation rho:mboxGal(barmathbbQ/mathbbQ)tomboxGL(n,V).rho:mboxGal(barmathbbQ/mathbbQ)tomboxGL(n,V). In some references (eg Serre's book on ellell-adic representations), VV is a vector space over a finite extension of mathbbQpmathbbQp. However, in more recent papers (eg Buzzard, Diamond, Jarvis) VV is a vector space over barmathbbQpbarmathbbQp. It is easy to show that the former definition is a special case of the latter, but I suspect, and would like to prove that they are actually the same. That is, I would like to show that the image of any any continuous Galois representation over barmathbbQpbarmathbbQp actually lies in a finite extension of mathbbQpmathbbQp.



Is this the case?



I think that a proof should use the fact that GmathbbQGmathbbQ is compact and that barmathbbQpbarmathbbQp is the union of finite extensions. I have tried to mimic the proof that barmathbbQpbarmathbbQp is not complete, but have not been able to find an appropriate Cauchy sequence in an arbitrary compact subgroup of GL(n,Vn,V).



(This is my first question, so please feel free to edit if appropriate. Thanks!)

No comments:

Post a Comment