Friday, 1 December 2006

Is there a way to define Hecke operators "inherently" as certain endomorphisms of the Jacobian?

Philip remarks that he wants to define the Hecke operator as an endomorphism of the Jacobian of "any Riemann surface X such that the endomorphism ring is defined over mathbfQ", and at the same time he wants the Hecke operator to reduce to rmFrobp+prmFrobp1. I think that for a generic Riemann surface X, the endomorphism ring is mathbfZ. However, rmFrobp+rmVerp is very unlikely to be an integer, so for a general X it is highly unlikely that there exists an element of rmEnd(X) that lifts rmFrobp+rmVerp. (I'm using rmVerp to denote the dual of Frobenius.)



Here is another closely related point. When A is an abelian variety with good reduction at a prime p, there is a natural map rmEnd(A)tormEnd(AmathbfFp). (See my remark here). I think this map is injective (consider the induced map on Tate modules at some good prime ell). Thus you could define the Hecke operator Tp to be the unique (if it exists!) lift of rmFrobp+rmVerp. That's intrinsic and makes no reference to any moduli space.

No comments:

Post a Comment