Processing math: 100%

Friday, 22 December 2006

pr.probability - Is every probability space a factor space of the Haar Measure on some group?

It is possible to find the following: A compact abelian group G with Haar measure muG, a subset SsubseteqG of full outer Haar measure and a measurable function fcolonStoX with muP(E)=muS(f1(E)) for measurable EsubseteqP. In fact, as you mention, G can be taken to be a large enough product of the circle group.



Here, I am implicitly referring to the sigma algebra mathcalB(S)equivScapEcolonEinmathcalB(G) and muS is the restriction of the Haar measure to mathcalB(S), muS(ScapE)=muG(E). Ideally, we would like to enlarge S so that it is actually of full measure, then it could be enlarged to all of G. I'm not sure if this is possible though (and suspect that it is not possible in ZFC). The problem is that if fcolonPtoQ is a measure preserving map of probability spaces then f(P) will be of full outer measure, but need not be measurable. If f1colonmathcalBQtomathcalBP is an onto map of their sigma algebras then P and Q are "almost isomorphic" probability spaces. If, however, f(P) is not measurable then f does not have a right inverse (even up to zero probability sets), unless we restrict to the subset f(P)subseteqQ.



In the following, I write 2={0,1}, so that, for a set I, 2^I is the set of {0,1}-valued functions from I.
Letting piicolon2Ito0,1 be the projection onto the i'th coordinate, the sets of the form pi1i(S) generate a sigma algebra, which I will denote by mathcalEI.



First, we can reduce the problem to that of measures on 2I.




Step 1: Given a collection AiiinI of sets generating the sigma algebra on P, construct a probability measure muI on 2I and a measure preserving map fcolonPto2I such that f1colonmathcalEItomathcalBP is onto.




Then, f will have a right inverse gcolonf(P)toP which is automatically measurable and measure preserving.
To construct f, define f(p)in2I by f(p)(i)=1 if pinAi and =0 otherwise. It can be checked that muI(S)=mu(f1(S)) for SinmathcalEI satisfies the required properties.



Now, I will use GI=(mathbbR/Z)I, which is a compact abelian group with Haar measure muGI, which is the product of the uniform measure on the circle G=mathbbR/Z.




Step 2: Construct a measure preserving map fcolonGIto2I.




Once this map is constructed, putting it together with step 1 gives what I claimed.



For any JsubseteqI, use piJcolon2Ito2J and rhocolonGItoGJ to denote restriction to J. Also use muJ(S)=muI(pi1J(S)) for the induced measure on 2J.
Zorn's lemma guarantees the existence of a subset JsubsetI and measure preserving map fcolonGJto2J which is maximal in the following sense: for JsubseteqKsubseteqI and measure preserving gcolonGKto2K with piJcircg=fcircrhoJ then K=J.



Then, J=I and we have constructed the required map. If not, choose any kinIsetminusJ, K=Jcupk and define hkcolonGKto2 as follows (I let Ak=pi1k(1)subseteq2I).



h_k(x)=begin{cases} 1,&textrm{if }0le x_klemu_I(A_kmidmathcal{E}_J)_{f(x)}\\ 0,&textrm{otherwise}. end{cases}



Defining gcolonGKto2K by g(x)i=f(x)i for iinJ and g(x)k=hk(x) gives a measure preserving map extending f, and contradicting the maximality of J.

No comments:

Post a Comment