According to my hand computation, the claim is not true for K=mathbbQ(sqrt[3]3). Have you checked this case?
It is true that a prime ramifies in K if and only if it ramifies in the Galois closure of K. There might be a formula like the one you are describing that is true for primes greater than d.
Warning: this part of the answer was written without access to my usual number theory references, so there may be errors. It isn't meant to be read by itself anyway; it is meant to be a guide to a good book on algebraic number theory, like Neukirch or Janusz.
Your fundamental strategy to be to relate the order of ramification of p in L and in the Galois closure of L. This does not precisely determine the power of p dividing the discriminant, but we have the following
Fact: Let L/K be an extension of number fields and p a prime of K with ramification indices e1, e2, ... er and residue field extensions of degree f1, f2, ..., fr. Then the power of p dividing DL/K is at least sum(ei−1)fi, with equality if and only if all the ei are less than relatively prime to the characteristic of p.
From now on, I will address the question of how to relate the orders of ramification in L and in the Galois closure. If you need to deal with the case that some of the ei are greater than or equal to the characteristic of p, you should read about higher ramification groups.
Let M be the Galois closure of L, let G be mathrmGal(M/K), and let H be the fixed field of L. Fix a prime p of K, and1 mathfrakp a prime over p. Let DsubseteqG be the decomposition group of mathfrakp and IsubsetD the inertia group. I is normal in D; the quotient D/I is cyclic and has a canonical generator F called the Frobenius.
I believe that FC's computation was for the case G=Sn, D=I=e,(12).
In M, the primes lying over p are in bijection with G/D. Each of them has f=|D/I| and e=|I|.
Let X=G/H (a set with G-action). In L, the primes above p are in bijection with the D-orbits in X. Let O be such a D-orbit, corresponding to a prime qO. Because I is normal, O breaks up as a union of I-orbits all of the same cardinality. Then qO has e equal to the cardinality of these I-orbits, and f equal to the number of them.
Using these ideas, you should be able to relate ramification in L and M for any G and H which interest you.
1 I fix mathfrakp only for expositional purposes. Changing mathfrakp will conjugate (D,I,F). Probably the right way to think of all of this stuff is working up to conjugacy.
No comments:
Post a Comment