Friday, 23 November 2007

reference request - What is the equivariant cohomology of a group acting on itself by conjugation?

For any interested latecomers who somehow discover this question in the future, I've found a very low-tech answer, bootstrapping from the low-tech answer to Is a Lie group equivariantly formal under conjugation by a maximal torus?.



Anyway, once you believe that the conjugation action upon a compact Lie group G of its maximal torus T is equivariantly formal, it follows that the action of G by conjugation is as well. This argument will actually work for any reasonably good space M on which G acts and the restricted T-action is equivariantly formal, because one has HG(M)=HT(M)W=(H(M)otimesH(BT))W=H(M)otimesH(BT)W=H(M)otimesH(BG) as H(BT)-modules, where W=NG(T)/T is the Weyl group of G.



If, say, you don't buy that the action of W on H(M) is trivial, a longer proof goes like this.



requireAMScd



The homotopy quotient MG is a further quotient of MT, and the projection EGtimesMtoEG then induces a commutative diagram



begin{CD}
M @= M\
@VVV @VVV\
M_T @>>> M_G\
@VVV @VVV\
BT @>>> BG
end{CD}



where the upper vertical maps are fiber inclusions.



The projection BT=EG/TtoEG/G=BG induces an inclusion H(BG)congH(BT)WhookrightarrowH(BT) in cohomology, and there are induced maps both in cohomology and on the Serre spectral sequences for the equivariant cohomologies, starting with this E2 page:



begin{CD}
H(M) @= H(M)\
@AAA @AAA\
H(M) otimes H(BT) @<<< H(M) otimes H(BG)\
@AAA @AAA\
H(BT) @<<< H(BG)
end{CD}



Because the top and bottom horizontal maps are injective, so is the middle one, so the differentials for the spectral sequence converging to HG(M) are restrictions of those for HT(M). But the differentials for HT(M) are all zero, by equivariant formality, so the spectral sequence for HG(M) collapses as well.

No comments:

Post a Comment