The Cartesian product of two empty sets is the singleton set containing the empty tuple. So, given a set which is empty, is defined as: Now, does that mean that satisfies the condition ? And if so, why don't we include the empty tuple in the Cartesian product of non-empty sets?
(It would be nice if you point out which concept I mis-understand: the set comprehension, or the tuple.)
Thanks in advance.
[edit: I should add the following link: Wikipedia: Empty_product#Nullary_Cartesian_product]
No comments:
Post a Comment