José Figueroa-O'Farrill has already pointed out one necessary condition, namely that your connection must be flat. The remaining condition is that the monodromy should be trivial. In what follows XX is any connected smooth manifold, not necessarily a surface, and GG is any Lie group.
Let's first consider the analogous situation when GG is replaced by mathbbRmathbbR. You can think of a one-form omegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg)omegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg) as potentially being the derivative of a map XtoGXtoG, just as a one-form etainOmega1(X;mathbbR)etainOmega1(X;mathbbR) is potentially the derivative of a map XtomathbbRXtomathbbR. We want to know when these really are the derivative of some map, i.e. when we can integrate these forms. (You mentioned the exponential map, but I think integration is the right metaphor here.)
There is a local obstruction, namely that if etaeta is to be integrable (meaning eta=dfeta=df for some ff) it must be closed, meaning deta=0deta=0; the Poincaré lemma tells us this is a sufficient condition for etaeta to be locally integrable. Then there is also a global condition, that the integral of etaeta around every closed loop must be 0 (unlike dthetadtheta on the circle, which has integral 2pi2pi); Stokes' theorem tells us this is a necessary condition for etaeta to be globally integrable. If we have these conditions, recovering the map ff from etaeta is easy; just write f(p)=intastpetaf(p)=intastpeta, which is well-defined by the above two conditions.
Now let's try to do the same for mathfrakgmathfrakg-valued one-forms. Start with a connection on the trivial GG-bundle XtimesGXtimesG with connection form omegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg)omegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg). We've talked about the connection being flat, which means that domega+frac12[omega,omega]=0domega+frac12[omega,omega]=0; but what does that have to do with flatness or integrability? Well, you can show that domega+frac12[omega,omega]domega+frac12[omega,omega] measures the Lie bracket of two horizontal vector fields, or rather measures the vertical part of the Lie bracket. Thus if this vanishes, the bracket of two horizontal vector fields is horizontal. By the Frobenius integrability theorem, this implies that the horizontal distribution of the connection is integrable; another way to say this is that parallel transport is locally well-defined. Now pick a basepoint astast and restrict your attention to a small neighborhood UU of astast. Since parallel transport is well-defined on UU, we get a function TcolonUtoGTcolonUtoG by saying that the parallel transport from astast to uu (along any path) is multiplication by T(u)T(u).
Key point: if you pull back the tautological form on GG by this "parallel transport" map TT, the form you get is the same as your original omegaomega!
What this tells us is that if a flat connection on XtimesGXtimesG comes from a map f:XtoGf:XtoG, then you can recover ff by looking at the parallel transport of the connection. (The analogue is that if eta=fast(dx)eta=fast(dx) for some fcolonXtomathbbRfcolonXtomathbbR, you can recover ff by integrating etaeta, also known as the fundamental theorem of calculus.) Thus flatness, in the form of the Maurer-Cartan equation, is the local obstruction to integrability; here the Frobenius integrability theorem plays the role that the Poincaré lemma does in the real case. To prove the key point is really just a matter of definitions: think about the correspondence between a connection, its connection form, and its parallel transport.
In particular, this tells us that parallel transport must be not just locally well-defined, but globally well-defined (meaning independent of the path), since transport along any path from astast to pp is always multiplication by f(p)inGf(p)inG. The monodromy of a flat connection is the map pi1(X,ast)toGpi1(X,ast)toG which sends a loop to the parallel transport around that loop, and so another way to say "parallel transport is globally well-defined" is that the monodromy is trivial.
This can all be summed up by saying that if XX is simply connected, we have an on-the-nose bijection Cinfty(X,G)longleftrightarrowomegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg)vertdomega+frac12[omega,omega]=0Cinfty(X,G)longleftrightarrowomegainOmega1(X;mathfrakg)vertdomega+frac12[omega,omega]=0. (Here on the left we assume the maps take the basepoint astinXastinX to 1inG1inG.) If XX has fundamental group, we need to add on the right side the additional condition that the monodromy of omegaomega be 0. This is hard to write down just in terms of omegaomega, but for the corresponding connection it is just that parallel transport is totally path-independent.
No comments:
Post a Comment