Edit: The answer below has been modified to reflect the comments.
My guess is that G is forced to be projective, hence free, in this situation. To show this, we need to verify that mathrmHom(G,−) is an exact functor. As we have an identification of functors mathrmHom(G,−)simeqlimimathrmHom(Fi,−), applying mathrmHom(G,−) to an exact sequence
0toAtoBtoCto0
of abelian groups, we get an induced sequence
0tolimimathrmHom(Fi,A)tolimimathrmHom(Fi,B)tolimimathrmHom(Fi,C)toR1limimathrmHom(Fi,A)to...
So it suffices to show that R1limimathrmHom(Fi,A) vanishes for any abelian group A. Is this true?
Here's a not-so-well-thought-out idea: if I chased elements correctly, an affirmative answer to the question above follows from the bijectivity of the natural map mathrmHom(Fj,A)tolimi<jmathrmHom(Fi,A), for j sufficiently big. After making the harmless assumption that the system (Fi) consists of all finitely generated saturated subgroups of G, the preceding bijectivity question translates to: given a free abelian group F of finite rank, when is the natural map mathrmcolimiHitoF an isomorphism, where the indexing set I is the poset of all proper saturated subgroups HisubsetF. I think the answer to this question is yes when the rank of F is at least 3 (which is enough for the application at hand), but I'm not sure.
No comments:
Post a Comment