This is a clarification of another post of mine.
Fix nn a positive integer. Let SL(n)SL(n) have its usual matrix representation, so that it really is the codimension-one subset of M(n)=mathbbRn2M(n)=mathbbRn2 cut out by the degree-nn condition that the determinant is 11. So we have n2n2 coordinate functions AijAij on SL(n)SL(n), i,j=1,dots,ni,j=1,dots,n.
Let UU be a domain in mathbbRnmathbbRn, with coordinates x1,dots,xnx1,dots,xn. Consider the set mathcalSmathcalS of smooth functions f:UtoSL(n)f:UtoSL(n) satisfying the differential equation fracpartialfijpartialxk=fracpartialfikpartialxjfracpartialfijpartialxk=fracpartialfikpartialxj for each i,j,k=1,dots,ni,j,k=1,dots,n (of course, fij=Aijcircffij=Aijcircf is the (i,j)(i,j)th coordinate of ff).
(Why would you care about mathcalSmathcalS? Because a smooth map g:UtomathbbRng:UtomathbbRn is volume-preserving if and only if fracpartialgipartialxjinmathcalSfracpartialgipartialxjinmathcalS, and every element of mathcalSmathcalS arises this way; indeed, mathcalSmathcalS is the space of volume-preserving maps up to translations.)
Let's agree that a smooth path in mathcalSmathcalS is a smooth function F:[0,1]timesUtoSL(n)F:[0,1]timesUtoSL(n) such that for each tin[0,1]tin[0,1], F(t,−)inmathcalSF(t,−)inmathcalS.
Question: Is mathcalSmathcalS smooth-path-connected? I.e. given f0,f1inmathcalSf0,f1inmathcalS, does there exist a smooth path FF so that F(0,−)=f0F(0,−)=f0 and F(1,−)=f1F(1,−)=f1?
If the answer is "no" in general, is it "yes" for sufficiently nice domains UU (contractible, say, or with compact closure and require that each finmathcalSfinmathcalS extend smoothly to a neighborhood of the closure, or...)?
No comments:
Post a Comment