A lot can be said in the finitely generated abelian case, just by using the structure theorem.
Call a group transversal if every subgroup has a complement; non-transversal of it has proper, nontrivial subgroups, none of which has a complement; and semi-transversal if it is not transversal but some proper, nontrivial subgroup has a complement.
Take a finite abelian group with , distinct primes and .
Then is transversal when for all , semi-transversal when and for some , and non-transversal when and .
For an infinite finitely generated abelian group , is non-transversal if , and semi-transversal otherwise.
Given a finitely generated abelian group and , call independent if and for all , , we have that implies for all . Call a basis of if it is independent and .
Then if , has a complement if and only if has a basis that can be expanded to a basis of . If is a basis for and for some basis of , then the complement of is .
So if is a vector space over then any subgroup has a complement, since any subspace has a basis that can be completed to the whole space. My definition of independence is the same as linear independence.
If is a free module over then my definition of independence is weaker than linear independence. I would like to say that has a complement if and only if it has a module basis, but I can't prove the reverse direction of this.
I know less about the divisible abelian case, except that if is a divisible abelian group then saying that has a complement is the same as saying that is divisible. In particular and the Prufer -group are both non-transversal.
No comments:
Post a Comment