I'll shorten the original sentence "Me staring in your dead eye with my hand around your throat" to the structurally equivalent "Me looking at you". Well, the equivalence extends to the part of the structure that counts, anyway.
Here, "me" is a disjunctive pronoun. The fact that the sentence doesn't follow the typical SVO structure of English sentence syntax isn't odd. It's an example of an elliptical construction, more specifically answer ellipsis. As has already been pointed out, sentences like "me looking at you" are pretty limited to being an answer to some question. Intuitively, it feels like there's something missing before "me" for this to be a full sentence that can stand alone without needing more discourse context. The standalone sentence would be SVO, and we can view the sentence with ellipsis as having an underlying SVO structure.
An example of something that would work to fill the gap is, e.g. "The last thing you'll see is" (for "The last thing you'll see is me looking at you"). If we take "The last thing you'll see is me looking at you" as the underlying, implied sentence, then "The last thing you'll see is" is a valid target for answer ellipsis, if the question is formed appropriately. By contrast, "The last thing you'll see is looking" is not a valid target for ellipsis given the underlying SVO sentence and so "Me at you" is ungrammatical in this context.
Something interesting is that as I mentioned, the answer "Me looking at you" is only grammatical if the question is formed appropriately. If the question is "What's the last thing that I'll see?", then the answer "Me looking at you" is fine. However, if the question is "What's the last thing that I'll see you looking at?", then the answer ellipsis sentence would be ungrammatical, but the non-elided answer would be fine:
Q: "What's the last thing that I'll see you looking at?"
A: *"Me looking at you" (bad)
A: "The last thing you'll see is me looking at you" (okay)
No comments:
Post a Comment