I know how I want to answer this question. I'll write up the easy parts here, and leave the hard part for you :).
First some minor changes. It will be convenient to clear out denominators and work with . That just changes the constant term of your Fourier series by . Next, it is convenient to focus on
A simple linear transformation goes between this and the cosine formulation. Let . So we are dealing with
Dropping out the , we want to show the integrand is of the form .
UPDATE: Thanks to fedja for pointing out that I had oversimplified the next paragraph.
Assuming that , we can integrate by parts with respect to one of the two variables, let's say . Once we do that, we will have a quantity of the form
So we'd like to show this quantity is of the form .
As fedja points out, we need to be careful here. Without the term, the integral diverges like near .
Whew! Now comes the actual hard part. Let This is an elliptic curve with four punctures. As Bjorn points out, this is a nodal cubic and can be parameterized as
We'll come back to this point later.
The -form has a simple pole on . Let be the -form on which is the residue of that -form.
I think there should be a curve in such that is homotopic, in , to a tubular neighborhood of . So
If we substitute in the above parameterization, this will be the integral around a closed loop of some rational function in . In particular, we can compute this integral by residues and we will get something of the form , as desired.
Actually, it looks to me like we should just get . Maybe the integration by parts doesn't go as well as I hoped?
Obviously, someone should actually work this out explicitly, but I don't think it will be me.
No comments:
Post a Comment