Thursday, 26 October 2006

nt.number theory - Subfields joining an algebraic element to another

EDIT: Okay, wrong. Sorry for spamming.



This looks just too easy, so I guess I'm doing something stupid.



I'll prove that



(a) whenever a subfield K of mathbbC satisfies betainKleft[alpharight], then betainleft(KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright)right)left[alpharight].



Adding to this the trivial observation that



(b) whenever a subfield K of mathbbC satisfies betanotinK, then betanotinKcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright),



we see that whenever a subfield K of mathbbC joins alpha to beta, its subfield KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright) does the same. This obviously settles 1) (even without the normal closure) and therefore 2).



So let's prove (a) now: Since betainKleft[alpharight], there exists a polynomial PinKleft[Xright] such that beta=Pleft(alpharight). Since KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright) is a vector subspace of K (where "vector space" means mathbbQ-vector space), there exists a linear map phi:KtoKcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright) such that phileft(vright)=v for every vinKcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright) (this may require the axiom of choice for infinite K, but if you want to consider infinite field extensions of mathbbQ I think you can't help but use the axiom of choice). Applying the linear map phi to every coefficient of the polynomial PinKleft[Xright], we get another polynomial Qinleft(KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright)right)left[Xright] which also satisfies beta=Qleft(alpharight) (since all powers of alpha and beta lie in KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright) and thus are invariant under phi). Thus, betainleft(KcapmathbbQleft(alpha,betaright)right)left[alpharight], qed.



Can anyone check this for nonsense?

No comments:

Post a Comment