The reciprocity map in the local case can be motivated by considering the unramified case. Let me try to explain this. For simplicity, let us consider the case of a finite abelian unramified extension of degree . Denote by the residue field of . The unramified condition gives rise to the isomorphism
Now we like to parametrize these abelian unramified extensions {} of using information from . However, is not finitely generated as a module over , let along over . , on the other hand, decomposes as
which, if anything, at least contains a copy of (depending on the choice of a uniformizer, say ).
It then seems somewhat natural to consider the map
where is a choice of a topological generator for , the Galois group of the maximal abelian unramified extension of , which is naturally isomorphic to (which is itself non-canonically isomorphic to ).
Now compose the Artin map with the restriction map , we obtain a map
whose kernel is which coincidentally is also the image of the norm of in .
This also sheds some light on the global situation, where you have Frobenius at all but finitely many primes. Don't quote me on this, but I recall the Artin reciprocity map is uniquely determined by its action on the Frobenii (I assume a Chebatorev density argument will show this, and you can prove Chebatorev Density Theorem independent of class field theory if I remember correctly.)
Lastly, we saw that the (local) reciprocity map depends on the choice of a Frobenius as well as that of a uniformizer.
No comments:
Post a Comment