Let mathfrakgmathfrakg be a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra (or the corresponding Lie group). For definiteness, I'll take mathfrakgmathfrakg to be of type AnAn, that is, mathfrakg=mathfraksln+1(mathbbC)mathfrakg=mathfraksln+1(mathbbC), but my question applies to semisimple Lie algebras of arbitrary Lie type. Consider the Dynkin diagram for mathfrakgmathfrakg. We can remove a node from the diagram to obtain a sub-diagram of type An−1An−1. The sub-diagram corresponds to a copy of the Lie algebra mathfrakg′:=mathfraksln(mathbbC) sitting inside mathfrakg.
The structure of the Lie algebra cohomology rings Hbullet(mathfrakg,mathbbC) and Hbullet(mathfrakg′,mathbbC) are known, and are the same as the cohomology rings Hbullet(G,mathbbC) and Hbullet(G′,mathbbC) for the corresponding complex Lie group. The computation of the cohomology rings is classical; for Lie algebras the computation is a result of Koszul.
In the specific case mathfrakg=mathfraksln+1(mathbbC), we have Hbullet(mathfrakg,mathbbC)=Lambda(x3,x5,ldots,x2n+1), an exterior algebra on homogeneous generators of degrees 3,5,ldots,2n+1. Then Hbullet(mathfrakg′,mathbbC)=Lambda(x3,x5,ldots,x2n−1). (For other Lie types, the cohomology ring is still an exterior algebra on homogeneous generators of certain odd degrees depending on the root system.)
The inclusion of Lie algebras mathfrakg′rightarrowmathfrakg gives rise to a corresponding restriction map in cohomology: Hbullet(mathfrakg,mathbbC)rightarrowHbullet(mathfrakg′,mathbbC).
Is the restriction map in cohomology map the "obvious'' map from Lambda(x3,x5,ldots,x2n+1) to Lambda(x3,x5,ldots,x2n−1), that is, the map that takes xi to xi for 1leqileq2n−1 and that takes x2n+1 to zero? If so, can you provide a reference for this fact? For other Lie types, is the restriction map also the obvious map?
Edit: In response to the comments below, I think I should have phrased the question as follows:
Hopefully clarified version of question: Is there a choice of generators for the cohomology rings Hbullet(mathfrakg,mathbbC) and Hbullet(mathfrakg′,mathbbC) such that the restriction map in cohomology has the above described form?
I acknowledge that things could get messier for restriction maps in type Dn and for types E6, E7, and E8, because in those cases the degrees of the generators for the cohomolgoy ring aren't as well-behaved. But maybe something can still be said in general about the restriction map (e.g., when is it surjective?).
No comments:
Post a Comment