Tuesday, 10 July 2007

ac.commutative algebra - Is completeness of a field an algebraic property?

I claim that, for a field KK, the following are equivalent:
(i) KK can be given a nontrivial norm -- i.e., there exists xinKxinK with |x|neq0,1|x|neq0,1.
(ii) KK admits a nontrivial rank one valuation vv.
(iii) KK admits infinitely many inequivalent rank one valuations vv such that (K,v)(K,v) is not complete.
(iv) KK is not an algebraic extension of a finite field.



Some of these facts are proved in



http://math.uga.edu/~pete/8410Chapter2v2.pdf



(see e.g. Theorem 1).



Let me prove here that (iv) impliesimplies (iii), which answers the OP's question in a rather definitive way.



1) Suppose first that KK has characteristic 00. Then KK contains mathbbQmathbbQ, which admits the pp-adic valuations vpvp. By Theorem 1 of loc. cit., each vpvp extends to a valuation on KK.



Now suppose that KK has characteristic pp and contains an element tt which is not algebraic over mathbbFpmathbbFp. Thus KK contains the rational function field mathbbFp(t)mathbbFp(t), which carries infinitely many inequivalent nontrivial valuations vPvP corresponding to the irreducible polynomials PinmathbbFp[t]PinmathbbFp[t] (and one more corresponding to the point at infinity on the projective line).



2) (F.K. Schmidt) If a field KK is complete with respect to two inequivalent rank one valuations, it is algebraically closed and uncountable. See e.g. Theorem 24 of



http://math.uga.edu/~pete/8410Chapter3.pdf



3) So we are reduced to the case in which KK is algebraically closed and uncountable. Then KK is isomorphic to the algebraic closure of K(t)K(t). If we give KK the trivial valuation and K(t)K(t) the Gauss norm vv, then the algebraic closure of K(t)K(t) has infinite degree over K(t)K(t) so any extension of vv to the algebraic closure is not complete. The image of the Gauss norm vv under the group PGL2(K)PGL2(K) of linear fractional transformations gives us infinitely more pairwise inequivalent valuations.

No comments:

Post a Comment