With regards part 2.
Let's assume that you have two components X1X1 and X2X2 (or even unions of components) such that X1cupX2=XX1cupX2=X=. Let I1I1 and I2I2 denote the ideal sheaves of X1X1 and X2X2 in XX.
Set ZZ to be the scheme X1capX2X1capX2, in other words, the ideal sheaf of ZZ is I1+I2I1+I2.
It is easy to see you have a short exact sequence
0toI1capI2toI1oplusI2to(I1+I2)to00toI1capI2toI1oplusI2to(I1+I2)to0
where the third map sends (a,b)(a,b) to a−ba−b.
The nine-lemma should imply that you have a short exact sequence
0toOXtoOX1oplusOX2toOZto00toOXtoOX1oplusOX2toOZto0
If you Hom this sequence into the dualizing complex of XX, you get a triangle
omega.Ztoomega.X1oplusomega.X2toomega.Xtoomega.Z[1]omega.Ztoomega.X1oplusomega.X2toomega.Xtoomega.Z[1]
You can then take cohomology and, depending on how things intersect (and what you understand about the intersection), possibly answer your question.
If X1X1 and X2X2 are hypersurfaces with no common components (which should imply everything in sight is Cohen-Macualay) then these dualizing complexes are all just sheaves (with various shifts), and you just get a short exact sequence
0toomegaX1oplusomegaX2toomegaXtoomegaZto00toomegaX1oplusomegaX2toomegaXtoomegaZto0
Technically speaking, I should also probably push all these sheaves forward onto XX via inclusion maps.
No comments:
Post a Comment