One way to interpret this result is that it comes from the periodicity of the continued fraction expansion of $phi = 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{cdots}}$ in the sense that it has no "better-than-expected" rational convergents, whereas for example with $pi = (3;7,15,1,292,cdots)$ we may stop at the 292 to get a good approximation (355/113 I believe).
So one may look at numbers of the form $x_n = (n;n,n,n,cdots)$, which satisfy $x_n^2 -nx_n - 1 = 0$, or $$x_n = frac{n+sqrt{n^2+4}}{2}.$$ So a few good sequences may be for example $left{nx_2right}$ where $x_2 = 1+sqrt{2}$, the so-called "silver ratio", or the same for $x_3 = (3+sqrt{13})/2.$
EDIT: These are in some cases pretty good approximations; one way to measure the "well-distribution" of such a sequence is to take the fractional parts ${lfloor nx_n rfloor: n = 1, cdots, M}$, sort them, compute the maximum difference between consecutive terms, and multiply this by $M$ to get some number in the range $[1,M)$. This can be accomplished in one line in Mathematica as follows:
WellDistribution[x_,M_]:=
Max[Differences[Sort[Table[N[FractionalPart[x*m]], {m, 1, M}]]]]*M;
Some interesting things happen with this when we vary $n$; perhaps I'll make a new post out of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment