Thursday, 31 August 2006

nt.number theory - Intuition behind the Eichler-Shimura relation?

(1) Short answer to first question: TpTp is about pp-isogenies, and in char. pp there is a canonical pp-isogeny, namely Frobenius.



Details:



The Hecke correspondence TpTp has the following definition, in modular terms:
Let (E,C)(E,C) be a point of X0(N)X0(N), i.e. a modular curve together with a cyclic subgroup
of order NN. Now TpTp (for pp not dividing NN) is a correspondence (multi-valued function) which maps
(E,C)(E,C) to sumD(E/D,(C+D)/D)sumD(E/D,(C+D)/D), where DD runs over all subgroups of EE of degree pp.
(There are p+1p+1 of these.)



Here is another way to write this, which will work better in char. pp:
map (E,C)(E,C) to sumphi:ErightarrowE(E,phi(C)),
where the sum is over all degree p isogenies phi:ErightarrowE. Giving a degree
p isogeny in char. 0 is the same as choosing a subgroup of order D of E (its kernel),
but in char. p the kernel of an isogeny can be a subgroup scheme which is non-reduced,
and so has no points, and hence can't be described simply in terms of subgroups of points.
Thus this latter description is the better one to use to compute the reduction of the
correspondence Tp mod p.



Now if E is an elliptic curve in char. p, any p-isogeny EtoE is either
Frobenius Fr, or the dual isogeny to Frobenius (often called Vershiebung).
Now Frobenius takes an elliptic curve E with j-invariant j to the elliptic curve
E(p) with j-invariant
jp. So the correspondence on X0(N) in char. p which maps (E,C) to (E(p),Fr(C)) is itself the Frobenius correspondence on X0(N). And the correspondence
which maps (E,C) to its image under the dual to Frobenius is the transpose
to Frobenius (domain and codomain are switched). Since there are no other p-isogenies in char. p
we see that Tp mod p=Fr+Fr as correspondences on X0(N) in char. p;
this is the Eichler--Shimura relation.



(2) Note that only weight 2 eigenforms with rational Hecke eigenvalues give elliptic curves;
more general eigenforms give abelian varieties.



An easy computation shows that if f is a Hecke eigenform, than the L-funcion
L(f,s), obtained by Mellin transform, has a degree 2 Euler product. A more conceptual answer would probably involve describing how automorphic representations
factor as a tensor product of local factors, but that it a very different topic from Eichler--Shimura, and I won't say more here.

No comments:

Post a Comment