Wednesday 12 August 2015

grammaticality - Because as a preposition

Conventionally because is considered a conjunction, because it links (or conjoins) two clauses. The argument against its classification as a conjunction is that because operate like other subordinating or coordinating conjunctions but does operate like prepositions.



This post on the Language Log demonstrates that because is not a conjunction by comparing it to that (subordinating conjunction) and and (coordinating conjunction). I summarize the argument below.



Typical subordinating conjunction: that



  • That can be omitted from a sentence and the sentence's meaning generally remains the same.

  • The clauses cannot be rearranged and maintain meaning: "[clause 1] that [clause 2]" != "that [clause 2], [clause 1]".

  • Complements follow that.

  • If because is omitted from a sentence the meaning does not remain the same.

  • With because the clauses can be rearranged.

  • Adjuncts generally follow because.

Typical coordinating conjunction: and



  • The two clauses joined by and can be rearranged and the meaning stays the same.

  • And cannot start a sentence.

  • Rearranging the clauses changes the meaning with because.

  • Because can start a sentence.

Because does not act like conjunctions, and thus is not a conjunction. It does, however, act like prepositions.



Prepositions can introduce noun-phrases, clauses, preposition phrases, and nothing, depending on the preposition. Because has long introduced clauses and preposition phrases (with of) and more recently also introduces noun-phrases.

No comments:

Post a Comment